On 1/6/2020 1:16 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Andreas Beckmann, le lun. 06 janv. 2020 00:42:00 +0100, a ecrit: >> gb bppphyview . ANY >> gb datovka . ANY > > Ran so. > >> Please give back all failed binNMU builds of datovka and bppphyview, >> these have been transient failures. Also include hurd-i386 which is in >> 'Failed' state and could not be handled by self-served give-backs. > > Ah, gb doesn't giveback those indeed. > > That's very unfortunate, since I use the Failed state to document what I > believe is the build issue (I have keyboard shortcuts that makes it easy > for me to find out quickly).
I have a hard time parsing what you want the state to be (and didn't we have this discussion before?). The syntax for gb is to add ". -o" at the end to override "Failed" - this had always been true. I'm not sure what the best way forward here would be. Technically a give-back discards some information here, but at the same time Hurd is probably the main consumer of "Failed" at this point. One could say "if there's a previous failed reason for the same version, put it into Failed again", but then it might actually be inaccurate. If you want "Failed" to be a valid state for *self-service* givebacks to work, let me know. Kind regards Philipp Kern
