Not to be a pain, but it seems that in the direction things are going it seems that there is a rather large dependency on cygwin, so shouldn't that be reflected in the name? Is cygwin that much of a trademark that the name couldn't be Debian GNU/Cygwin? Linux is also a trademark, but Linus doesn't seem to mind Debian GNU/Linux. Do we know that RedHat will mind? The arch could then be cygwin-i386. Which would be nice because it lends well to cygwin-i64. When we can get rid of the dependency on cygwin and work on a native windows platform I think then the right name would be Debian GNU/w32 and w32-i386. Then as far as the i64 issue, maybe it could be wxp-i64 ;-)
-- ======================================================================= Paul J. Baker Internet Systems Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Where2GetIt.com =======================================================================
