On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 05:14:05PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote: > On Mon, 2003-07-21 10:04:46 -0400, Brian White wrote: > > >OS: Windows 2000 or XP. Since 95/98/ME/NT are obsolete by MS standards, > > I don't think we need to support it. Let's make use of the abilities > > of the newer operating system versions rather than try to be > > compatible across all of them. > > Sorry, > > but 'Windows ME' = 'Windows 2000' > > The only ddifference is, that There are only a 'Windows ME Home Edition' > and then 'Windows 2000 Professional' and 'Windows 2000 Enterprise'. >
Umm, sorry. That's just totally wrong. ME is the culmination of the win9x line, and 2k is of the NT line. The differences are vast (not least being that ME is a pimple upon the arse of MS Windows and 2k is pretty good for what it is). Cheers, Stephen
