Your message dated Thu, 19 Mar 2020 23:15:49 -0400 with message-id <CANTw=mo+evuz8tluijh_vewct1qk6cu-ubdyhvcvydsxrwo...@mail.gmail.com> and subject line Re: Bug#951915: wine32: Nearly impossible to install the package has caused the Debian Bug report #951915, regarding wine32: Nearly impossible to install the package to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected] immediately.) -- 951915: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=951915 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: wine32 Version: 5.0-3 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** * What led up to the situation? dpkg --add-architecture i386 && apt-get update && apt install wine32 to get Wine32 to have Windows 32bits * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)? My solution (horrible): mv libpixman-1-0 libavc1394-0 libiec61883-0 libsamplerate0 libpciaccess0 ~/doc64/ mv libpixman libavc1394 libdv4 libjpeg62-turbo libiec61883 libsamplerate libpsl5 libpciaccess libshine3 libxss1 libxshmfence1 ~/doc64 it works * What was the outcome of this action? 10 dependencies do not want to install: the install tries to replace the /usr/share/doc/package directory, to change the changelog.Debian.gz and, of course, refuses. I guess changelog.Debian.gz is different between i386 and amd64. * What outcome did you expect instead? Should find some solution to make both arch go togheher. *** End of the template - remove these template lines *** An alternate idea? Should I reportbug to each of these packages? Regards -- Package-specific info: /usr/bin/wine points to /usr/bin/wine-stable. -- System Information: Debian Release: bullseye/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 5.4.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Kernel taint flags: TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled Versions of packages wine32 depends on: ii libc6 2.29-10 ii libwine 5.0-3 Versions of packages wine32 recommends: ii wine [wine] 5.0-3 Versions of packages wine32 suggests: pn wine32-preloader <none> Versions of packages wine32 is related to: pn dxvk <none> pn dxvk-wine32-development <none> pn dxvk-wine64-development <none> ii fonts-wine 5.0-3 ii wine [wine] 5.0-3 ii wine32 5.0-3 pn wine64 <none> -- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---On Sun, Feb 23, 2020 at 10:45 PM Michael Gilbert wrote: > This should only be a problem if the i386 and amd64 packages have > different version numbers [0]. For the packages you list, this is > currently not the case for bullseye. Given no extra feedback, I assume this was caused by local modifications to your system. Best wishes, Mike
--- End Message ---
