I was about posting an ITA xabacus. Scrolling thru BTS, I saw :
- Adrian Bunk temporarily adopted xabacus (bug#84746).
- IIUC, Ingo Rohlfs wanted to adopt the package and retitle RFA to ITA
(bug#87991).
Now,
Work-needing packages report for Apr 27, 2001 mentions:
xabacus (#87991), offered 57 days ago
Description: Simulation of the ancient oriental calculator
Does Ingo still want to adopt xabacus ?
If so, what's wrong with BTS ?
Did I miss something ?
Thanks.
--
Eric VAN BUGGENHAUT
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
