Your message dated Thu, 22 Nov 2001 10:49:04 +0100 (CET)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Is it really needed to package the Contents-* files?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Mar 2001 18:02:26 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 30 12:02:26 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (localhost) [149.156.65.138]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14j3EA-0001tm-00; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 12:02:26 -0600
Received: from piotr by localhost with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
id 14j3Cz-0000O2-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 20:01:13 +0200
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 20:01:12 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RFP: Contents-* - Please package Contents-*.gz files
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i
From: Piotr Krukowiecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Piotr Krukowiecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2001-03-30
Severity: wishlist
Contents-*.gz files are very usefull. AFAIR they are generated weekly.
Having to download them manually is not very comfortable.
Why not apt-get install contents-i386 and have it always up-to-date?
In addition, package could be upgraded only when Contents-*.gz file has
really changed (e.g sort both files and diff them or sth. like that)
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux localhost 2.4.0.uni #1 pi± lut 16 20:06:11 CET 2001 i586
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 92220-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Nov 2001 09:49:09 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 22 03:49:09 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from hermes.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de [129.187.176.19]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 166qTl-0000ib-00; Thu, 22 Nov 2001 03:49:09 -0600
Received: (qmail 20167 invoked from network); 22 Nov 2001 09:48:58 -0000
Received: from mimas.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de (HELO mimas) (129.187.176.26)
by hermes.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de with SMTP; 22 Nov 2001 09:48:58 -0000
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 10:49:04 +0100 (CET)
From: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Piotr Krukowiecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Is it really needed to package the Contents-* files?
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 20 Nov 2001, Piotr Krukowiecki wrote:
> What do you thing about filling a wishlist against grep-dctrl to
> include such script (and other things i mentioned in my prev. mail)?
There's no reason against it, but please check Joeys suggestion of
auto-apt before.
> > We have currently over 100 open RFPs. If I find the time to complete it
> > I'd e.g. like to send a list of open RFPs to debian-devel - and I don't
>
> Don't understand me wrongly, i appreciate work you're doing on this, but
> debian have much more open serious bugs and RFPs are quite low priority.
> Besides,
>
> > want that the RFPs for programs that should be packaged to be hidden
> > behind such RFPs like this one.
>
> you can always omit such RFPs or put them in "not important" section.
The RFPs are all of the same priority listed at [1].
> > I'd really like to close this RFP.
>
> Ok, go on. I don't really need such package now. If someone thinks it's
> needed he'll reopen this bug or file a new one.
Thanks, I'm closing it.
cu
Adrian
[1] http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/requested
--
Get my GPG key: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] | gpg --import
Fingerprint: B29C E71E FE19 6755 5C8A 84D4 99FC EA98 4F12 B400
