Your message dated Mon, 3 Dec 2001 18:45:14 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#122172: ITP: librazor-perl -- Razor Spam
Checking/Cataloguing database
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Dec 2001 01:12:59 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 02 19:12:59 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from fep02-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com [66.185.86.72]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16AhfH-0005UR-00; Sun, 02 Dec 2001 19:12:59 -0600
Received: from red.daf.2y.net ([24.42.131.177])
by fep02-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com
(InterMail vM.5.01.04.01 201-253-122-122-101-20011014) with SMTP
id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sun, 2 Dec 2001 20:12:27 -0500
Received: from daf by red.daf.2y.net with local (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian))
id 16AhbP-00010J-00; Sun, 02 Dec 2001 20:08:59 -0500
Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2001 20:08:59 -0500
From: Duncan Findlay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ITP: librazor-perl -- Razor Spam Checking/Cataloguing database
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.24i
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.37
X-Debbugs-CC: [email protected]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2001-12-02
Severity: wishlist
Package name : librazor-perl
Version : 1.17
Upstream Author : Vipul Ved Prakash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL : http://razor.sourceforge.net
License : Artistic
Description : Razor Spam checking/cataloguing database
This really enhances libmail-spamassassin-perl, which I am working on, and
is quite useful on its own. It can be set to compare incoming mail with an
online database of confirmed spam, so nothing gets through! Of course, you
also have the option of adding mail to the database.
--=20
Duncan Findlay
--wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE8CtCqqjUzNGvmnNARAiELAJ9Z2IeWKblepsYd+AntFBPfW+NXtQCgzntQ
hvBKvZs4vUz8ENmj0WePq9w=
=4F23
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 122172-done) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Dec 2001 23:49:07 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 03 17:49:07 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from fep02-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com [66.185.86.72]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16B2pf-0008SW-00; Mon, 03 Dec 2001 17:49:07 -0600
Received: from red.daf.2y.net ([24.42.131.177])
by fep02-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com
(InterMail vM.5.01.04.01 201-253-122-122-101-20011014) with SMTP
id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Mon, 3 Dec 2001 18:48:35 -0500
Received: from daf by red.daf.2y.net with local (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian))
id 16B2lw-0000co-00; Mon, 03 Dec 2001 18:45:16 -0500
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2001 18:45:14 -0500
From: Duncan Findlay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Robert van der Meulen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#122172: ITP: librazor-perl -- Razor Spam Checking/Cataloguing
database
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.24i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 03:19:44PM +0100, Robert van der Meulen wrote:
> Hi,
>=20
> Quoting Duncan Findlay ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > Package name : librazor-perl
> I itp-ed and uploaded the 'razor' package last week, i'm waiting for it to
> be in the archive. It does include the razor libs, i can split it in a
> 'razor' and a 'librazor-perl' if you can use that for your anti-spam
> package. In any case, 'librazor-perl' (or its contents) are already in
> Debian.
>=20
Alright then, I'll withdraw this ITP. However, I'm just wondering if razor
is the proper name for this package, since it is/contains a perl library,
and is thus subject to the Debian perl policy, specifying that a package
such as Foo::Bar must be named libfoo-bar-perl, etc.
--=20
Duncan Findlay
--WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE8DA6JqjUzNGvmnNARAjv0AJ0dno5rk4ZxKQyQCRDiSagb0rHthgCgq2Co
nFY6mop1b7/Le2nngz1a17U=
=gAE5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu--
