Your message dated Thu, 28 Feb 2002 15:03:30 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#136210: O: rar
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Feb 2002 18:21:10 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 28 12:21:10 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from maticompxp.w-s.pl (mati) [212.244.86.90]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16gVB0-0006RS-00; Thu, 28 Feb 2002 12:21:10 -0600
Received: (qmail 5109 invoked by uid 1000); 28 Feb 2002 18:20:37 -0000
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Mateusz Papiernik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: O: rar
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.44
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 19:20:37 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-02-28
Severity: normal
rar in debian Sid is version 2.70, but on RAR website
there is version 2.90 and maybe above. I think packages
rar and unrar must be orphaned, because maintainer
doesn't update them.
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux mati.kimnet 2.2.19 #1 Sat Jun 9 13:04:06 EST 2001 i686
Locale: LANG=pl_PL, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 136210-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Feb 2002 21:03:31 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 28 15:03:31 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from tennyson.netexpress.net [64.22.192.12] (root)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16gXi7-0000KF-00; Thu, 28 Feb 2002 15:03:31 -0600
Received: from tennyson.netexpress.net ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1])
by tennyson.netexpress.net (8.12.1/8.12.1/Debian -5) with ESMTP id
g1SL3UqQ004409;
Thu, 28 Feb 2002 15:03:30 -0600
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by tennyson.netexpress.net (8.12.1/8.12.1/Debian -5) id g1SL3UDX004407;
Thu, 28 Feb 2002 15:03:30 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: tennyson.netexpress.net: vorlon set sender to [EMAIL
PROTECTED] using -f
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 15:03:30 -0600
From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#136210: O: rar
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="TakKZr9L6Hm6aLOc"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--TakKZr9L6Hm6aLOc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Where is the evidence in the BTS that you tried to contact the=20
maintainer of these packages before orphaning them for him? There are=20
only two bugs open against both of these packages, *altogether*. There
is no sign that anyone has even filed a bug against these packages=20
asking for the new upstream versions.
If you want to see the new upstream versions of unrar and rar included=20
in Debian, go about it properly -- file wishlist bugs against the=20
packages. Orphaning is for when a maintainer no longer wishes to=20
maintain a package properly or cannot be contacted.
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 07:20:37PM +0100, Mateusz Papiernik wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Version: N/A; reported 2002-02-28
> Severity: normal
> rar in debian Sid is version 2.70, but on RAR website
> there is version 2.90 and maybe above. I think packages
> rar and unrar must be orphaned, because maintainer
> doesn't update them.
--TakKZr9L6Hm6aLOc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE8fpsgKN6ufymYLloRAl6VAJ98ShkZOM5DDtzarDLEhZ1CfcB+gwCgysvL
A1uFbDpD4gxe68eoumnH6zo=
=QaW7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--TakKZr9L6Hm6aLOc--
