Hi, On Mon, Aug 15 2011, Miriam Ruiz wrote: >> I think both of these clauses fail to meet DFSG. > > While that might be true for scratch itself, AFAIK the whole code for > the plugins is MIT licensed [0] [1]. Those plugins are not only used > by Scratch itself, but also by a number of derivative projects [2] [3] > [4]. I'm personally interested in BYOB [2], not in Scratch.
Ah! I see, that makes sense; I didn't realize there were other licenses involved. Sounds good. Thanks, - Chris. -- Chris Ball <[email protected]> <http://printf.net/> One Laptop Per Child -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
