Great thank you :) I'll try to isolate the changes on gtkimageview copy (the remaining bugs are certainly due to this difference). Many changes seem to be only due to the rename, maybe the actual diff is not so big.
Regards, Julien Lavergne Le 11/27/2011 12:26 PM, Yao Wei a écrit : > > I forgot to mention that my modifications are in "gtkimageview" branch. > > https://github.com/medicalwei/Viewnior/tree/gtkimageview > > Sorry for your inconvenience. > ----- 原始郵件 ----- > > Hi, > > > > I can't see any modifications from the upstream trunk. Did you push the > > modifications to github ? > > > > Regards, > > Julien Lavergne > > > > Le 11/25/2011 05:41 AM, Yao Wei a écrit : > > > > > > Actually I did a runable diff in Github: (but some zooming and mouse > > > wheel won't work) > > > > > > http://github.com/medicalwei/viewnior > > > > > > ----- 原始郵件 ----- > > > > On 11/23/2011 07:02 AM, Julien Lavergne wrote: > > > > > > > > > Argh, bad news :( > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, it turns this from a technical issue (package the app, and > make > > > > sure it meets packaging standards) into a much more difficult > "how to > > > > keep everyone happy" political issue! > > > > > > > > > Do we have an idea of the actual diff between the 2 versions ? > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll see if I can diff this over the coming weekend, unless someone > > > else > > > > does it first :) > > > > > > > > > Contacting gtkimageview upstream is a good idea, a backup plan > may > > > > > be to patch the package in Debian, but it's not a very nice > > > > > solution :( > > > > > > > > > > > > Another backup plan might be to create a "libviewnior" package with > > > > the modified library in it, and then a viewnior package that > depends > > > > on it and uses it instead of gtkimageview?? But I don't know if > > > > Debian would like/accept that as an approach. > > > > > > > > Jonathan > > > > > >
