On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 09:30 -0500, Robert James Clay wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 08:49 -0500, Chris Travers wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 5:43 AM, Robert James Clay <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > How sensitive is LedgerSMB to which version of Scriptaculous is
> > > being used? The embedded version appears to be 1.8.2, but it's
> > > available in Debian as different versions. (v1.9.0 is the current
> > > version in Debian testing, and the current Debian stable has v1.8.3.)
> > >
> > I don't know of any testing we have done on other versions. We don't
> > use a lot of advanced stuff so I would expect it would work. If bugs
> > are found, though, we can correct them.
>
> Ok, I'll look into what's needed for the LedgerSMB Debian package to
> use the Scriptaculous Debian package. (Likely just a patch for where
> LSMB looks for it.)
Note that the above resulted from the following Lintian warnings
found during test builds:
W: ledgersmb: extra-license-file
usr/share/ledgersmb/UI/ajax/scriptaculous/MIT-LICENSE
W: ledgersmb: embedded-javascript-library
usr/share/ledgersmb/UI/ajax/scriptaculous/lib/prototype.js
W: ledgersmb: embedded-javascript-library
usr/share/ledgersmb/UI/ajax/scriptaculous/src/scriptaculous.js
Jame
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1323960457.3919.28.camel@svrpc
