On 08/03/12 13:59, Jonathan McCrohan wrote: >> Shouldn't it be included in the transmission-cli package instead? > > I guess it could be included in transmission-cli. I thought > transmission-remote-cli would be better suited to its own package > because it a third-party transmission tool, and not part of the > transmission project itself [1].
I agree it's probably better to have its own package. I also have an ITP for transmission-remote-gtk, which is in a similar situation. That being said: I haven't checked the source, but I'm a bit curious about its use of transmission-remote. Does it depend on specific input/output formats? Did upstream at some point declare a "stable API" for using transmission-remote in scripts? I'm just worried this might be a small nightmare to maintain in the long run... Cheers -- Leo "costela" Antunes [insert a witty retort here] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f58c0e5.4070...@debian.org
