On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 02:29:23PM +0200, Mike Gabriel wrote: > It would probably make sense to rename the console executable (as > provided by upstream) to cream-terminal then? Of course (and poke upstream to do that, not just rename it in the package).
> Or will Debian accept an binary with the name of console in /usr/bin? I was going to answer "of course no" but then I've found /usr/bin/console in conserver-client package. That's a bad idea anyway. -- WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
