On Fri, 19 Dec 2014 11:23:24 -0800 Jeff Welling <jeff.well...@hootsuite.com> wrote: > Bump - Any progress on this? Or alternatives? > >
@Jeff & @Madkiss & @Everyone else I've submitted an ITP for crmsh (an alternative to pcs). This was do-able because a package specific for crmsh doesn't exist for Debian yet, as it's bundled with the old version of cman sitting in stable. However, I also intend to package pcs/pcsd, corosync, and pacemaker as well. I'm not sure what's going on with debian-ha -> they should have been the ones to sponsor this package to begin with and to have helped maintain it. Upstream states madkiss is the only developer they've seen active in a very long time. The problem the other packages, is that while those packages exist (corosync, pcs, pacemaker), I need the maintainers to either sponsor my contributions or allow me to join the team as a maintainer. I don't NEED to make new packages, but we do need to clean things up and get everything up to date. I've poked debian-ha asking to join the team, and I've let it be known to the devel mailing list that I want to get debian-ha going again if its inactive. I've been in contact with clusterlabs and feist (feist is the author of pcs/pcsd). I've authored upstream changes and contributed to both crmsh and pcs/pcsd. The current stack available in Debian needs updating, as the stack has changed significantly over the years. How we bundle the software can even be drastically changed so its much simpler, I'm hoping to get everything rolling again - or at least help if debian-ha isn't in fact inactive. As far as that alternative is concerned...crmsh would be it -> though you'd need an updated pacemaker and corosync as well, due to the drastic API changes. The same would go for pcs/pcsd as well. @Madkiss The last dev post on this was in 2013: Please let me know if I can help with pcs/pcsd (maintain, adopt, anything really). Thanks :) -- Rik
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
