Kyle Moffett wrote: > > Well, if you could package Bazel… :) > > Unfortunately, there's more work than just "packaging" Bazel. Just to > package Bazel, the open issues are:
[…] Oh! My smiley was meant to represent how packaging Bazel is not a simple task and thus imply you were delaying for no obvious reason! Apologies that did not come across via email. > But... even with that, Bazel cannot be used to _build_ a Debian > package, because it does not create Debian-policy-compliant binaries Oh, can you elaborate on this? > [...] Thanks so much for clarifying the other issues; very useful for myself and for others coming across this bug report. If your opinionn should, for example, Roughtime try and rewrite the build system in the meantime/long-term? Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `-