On Dec/29, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > I think we should stick with this proposal of appending the type along > with the name. > > 1. On autocompletions, it'd autocomplete to "execsnoop-", which is an > invalid name either way. This will expect the user to pay attention > and fire the correct command. > > 2. This approach is explicit, visible and allows for co-existence for > both. > > So, unless there is a concern, I'd want to target this change for the > next upload of both the tools. The bpfcc follow-up upload is pending > because of a FTBFS bug. And on the perf-tools side, there haven't been > any substantial changes lately, warranting an upload. > > But whatever triggers the upload, we'll make this change included ?
Sounds good to me. Maybe worth documenting in README.Debian as well ? Cheers, --Seb
