> For the records I do not think that this is important since the > whole > purpose of the program is accessing this data, but the other > objections > are significant enough that I do not see much value in having this > packaged.
I agree that Steve's last point got me, too. As long as one has to check the created config file manually there is no point in automating the rest of it. > > That is actually a good point. I wonder if using a local copy might > > be > > a good alternative. > > Obviously not, since it would quickly become stale considering the > nature of the data. This I don't understand. The way I understand it these are legit offerings by universities, telcos, etc. Why should they become stale? Michael -- Michael Meskes Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org) Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org Jabber: michael at xmpp dot meskes dot org VfL Borussia! Força Barça! SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
