Chris Lamb wrote: > Kyle Moffett wrote: > > > > Well, if you could package Bazel… :) > > > > Unfortunately, there's more work than just "packaging" Bazel. Just to > > package Bazel, the open issues are: > > […] > > Oh! My smiley was meant to represent how packaging Bazel is not a simple > task and thus imply you were delaying for no obvious reason! Apologies > that did not come across via email. > > > But... even with that, Bazel cannot be used to _build_ a Debian > > package, because it does not create Debian-policy-compliant binaries > > Oh, can you elaborate on this? > > > [...] > > Thanks so much for clarifying the other issues; very useful for myself > and for others coming across this bug report. > > If your opinionn should, for example, Roughtime try and rewrite the build > system in the meantime/long-term?
Gentle ping on this? Best wishes, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `-