Alan DeKok:
>   We've been looking for a new Debian maintainer for a while.
>   What, exactly, is in "bad shape" about this package?  If there are issues, 
> we can work towards fixing them.
>   The software is widely used by many tens of thousands of sites.  I hope 
> it's not going to be removed from Debian.
>   I'll note that Debian also packages "livingston-radius", which hasn't had 
> any source changes in 20 years.  There's no mailing list, no support, and it 
> doesn't implement any of the modern RADIUS standards.
>   Including that package does a disservice to people who install it, and then 
> realize it's next to useless.


I am CC'ing Michael on your reply as I am not sure he is subscribed to
the bug (it is not the default for Debian bugs) and he is probably
better at answering this given his prior work with the package.


Reply via email to