On Fri, 14 May 2021 00:04:52 +0200 Bastian Germann <b...@linutronix.de> wrote: > Control: retitle -1 ITP: openh264 -- H.264 encoding and decoding > > On Sat, 8 May 2021 18:28:35 +0200 Bastian Germann <bastiangerm...@fishpost.de> wrote: > > This is fine. The package must not reside in main. If you plan to > > release the package (the downloader) under a DFSG-compatible license, > > please submit it to contrib rather than non-free. > > I am currently packaging openh264. > (I was checking the RFS, thats why I came accross this ITP)
I'm confused; is there now a legal patent problem with the library that could affect/hurt Debian? Has this been discussed on e.g debian-legal or with the ftp masters beforehand? Is this RFS package now a downloader or the library itself? -- tobi