On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 03:12:21PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Wed, 2022-12-14 at 15:27:18 +0100, Juri Grabowski wrote:
> > * Package name    : distribution-gpg-keys
> >   Upstream Author : Miroslav Suchý <msu...@redhat.com>
> > * URL             : https://github.com/xsuchy/distribution-gpg-keys/
> >   Description     : GPG keys by various Linux distributions
> > 
> > used by various Linux distributions to sign packages.
> > 
> > needed by mock/3.5 and I need a sponsor for this package. See current 
> > packaging in
> > https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-rpm-team/distribution-gpg-keys
> > After I know ITP bug number I upload this source package to
> > https://mentors.debian.net/package/distribution-gpg-keys/

> (If this project is also intended to only cover RPM-based distributions,
> as Adam brought up, you might want to further ask them to make that clear
> from the project name, say rpm-distribution-openpgp-keys or similar.

When in that project's native environment, ie a RPM distribution, the name
_is_ adequate.  It's only in Debian (/Alpine/Arch/Gentoo/...) where the
name can be confusing.  But then, there's no requirement for the package
name to match upstream.


Meow!
-- 
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ Quis trollabit ipsos trollos?
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀

Reply via email to