> why is a team that do not maintain psutil "a good place" to maintain > this strong dependency of psutil?
Since it's a dependency to multiple top level projects of the OpenStack ecosystem, there is an interest for Debian OpenStack maintainer to maintain it. And since the psutil library is, as it looks like, under a single debian maintainer (you), it felt strange for a random (me) to just pin another dependency on them. Of course, it makes more sense for the psutil maintainer to maintain this strong psutil dependency. On Thu, Feb 26, 2026 at 12:39 AM Sandro Tosi <[email protected]> wrote: > > This package is necessary for upgrading python-psutil. This used to be > > part of the psutil project, but it was splitoff in its own project. > > I do believe, either the Python team or the OpenStack team could be a > > good place for this. > > why is a team that do not maintain psutil "a good place" to maintain > this strong dependency of psutil? > > -- > Sandro Tosi - http://sandrotosi.me/ >
