Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Simon Josefsson <[email protected]>
There was a package 'lsh' in Debian but removed back in 2005: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/lsh All those uploads are below the 2.1 version of GNU lsh that I intend to package, so there would not ever be any version conflict between binary packages, and no need to start with an epoch as far as I can see. I am not certain it is permitted to re-use an earlier source package name for a different package. Is that okay? If there is a problem, I suggest 'gnu-lsh' as the source package name, to avoid conflict. We could still use 'lsh' for the binaries because that should be no problem; compare the recent 'git-merge-changelog' introduction, which took over the binary name of another source package. I think re-using the 'lsh' source name would be fine, since the earlier package was removed 20+ years ago in Debian. * Package name : lsh Version : 2.1 Upstream Author : Niels Möller, et al * URL : https://www.lysator.liu.se/~nisse/lsh/ * License : GPL-2.0 Programming Lang: C Description : A GNU implementation of the Secure Shell protocols lsh is a free implementation (in the GNU sense) of the ssh version 2 protocol, standardised by the IETF SECSH working group. Hope to package and maintain 'lsh' from here: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/lsh /Simon
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
