Your message dated Sat, 20 Mar 2004 15:54:03 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Nickle has been packaged
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Mar 2003 20:42:12 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 21 14:42:12 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from linus.linuxlab.cs.pdx.edu [131.252.214.100]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18wTLA-0006ME-00; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 14:42:12 -0600
Received: from me by linus.linuxlab.cs.pdx.edu with local (Exim 3.36 #1
(Debian))
id 18wTL9-0007Fh-00; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 12:42:11 -0800
From: Erin Chapman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ITP: nickle -- Nickle is a desk calculator and software prototyping
environment.
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 12:42:11 -0800
X-Debbugs-CC: [email protected]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Erin E Chapman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=4.0
tests=FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD,HAS_PACKAGE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,
X_DEBBUGS_CC
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2003-03-21
Severity: wishlist
* Package name : nickle
Version : x.y.z
Upstream Author : Bart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.nickle.org/
* License : (GPL, LGPL, BSD, MIT/X, etc.)
Description : Nickle is a desk calculator and software prototyping
environment.
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux linus 2.4.9-linuxlab-dell #1 Fri Sep 14 09:29:12 PDT 2001 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 185796-done) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Mar 2004 23:57:50 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 20 15:57:50 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (home.keithp.com) [63.227.221.253]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1B4qLe-0003vI-00; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 15:57:50 -0800
Received: from sendmail (helo=evo.keithp.com)
by home.keithp.com with local-esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1B4qIK-00027L-00; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 15:54:24 -0800
Received: from keithp (helo=evo.keithp.com)
by evo.keithp.com with local-esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1B4qI1-0004Qc-00; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 15:54:05 -0800
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.3.1 11/28/2001 with nmh-1.1-RC1
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Keith Packard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Nickle has been packaged
From: Keith Packard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1644138683P";
micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 15:54:03 -0800
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Mail Forwarding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12
X-Spam-Level:
--==_Exmh_1644138683P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
I've gone ahead and packaged nickle by myself now, so this bug isn't
relevant any longer.
nickle-2.28-2 is in unstable.
-keith
--==_Exmh_1644138683P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.3.1 11/28/2001
iD8DBQFAXNmbQp8BWwlsTdMRAv8VAJ0byK7pHZrJ5wYhDTObdAKbBhyUCQCdEZaR
jUfwy8b3arLtS9UEv0SHtTs=
=UNev
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1644138683P--
