-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi,
I was planning on adopting libglade2 in cooperation with the Debian GNOME Team, and uploading 2.3.6 to experimental with them, but you beat me to the bugmail. Are you a DD? I am not, but was going to be sponsored by the GNOME Team guys... if you want to maintain this that is fine with me. Sebastian Bacher has asked me to maintain glade-2 and I figured I'd take libglade2 along with it... I have already checked in a debian/ dir for libglade2 2.3.6 into the pkg-gnome subversion repository and have converted it to use cdbs; I have not yet done the same for 2.0.1 in unstable although I have checked the current 2.0.1 debian/ dir into our svn repository as well. (http://svn.debian.org/viewcvs/pkg-gnome/ ; 2.0.1 is under desktop/branches/2.4/ and 2.3.6 is under desktop/trunk/) Also, Gustavo Noronha Silva has uploaded libglade2 2.0.1-7 just a few minutes ago which contains a small fix in the Suggests: (it just had 'glade' and needed to be 'glade-2 | glade-gnome2') and he also changed the maintainer to me, by my request. I apologize for not mailing this in sooner.. I was too occupied with learning cdbs and svn yesterday and forgot about hunting this bug down. Please let me know what you think; I am most concerned with keeping you from doing duplicate work. I believe the changes to build system for 2.3.6 could easily be used for 2.0.1 as well. James Curbo -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFAXhnYxMpqVQpLJj8RAlIrAJ0YIZsFhwzUGAq106PpWoYa3+w+4ACfffgj 0SQzhnp9Ov29CooSdryIP6E= =2M0I -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
