Your message dated Sat, 10 Apr 2004 19:30:13 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Apr 2003 10:06:08 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 11 05:06:08 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (tiger.med-info.com) [216.184.11.129]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 193vQ7-0001TJ-00; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 05:06:07 -0500
Received: from tiger.med-info.com ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1])
by tiger.med-info.com (8.12.8/8.12.8/Debian-1) with ESMTP id
h3BA5ati027032
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=OK);
Fri, 11 Apr 2003 04:05:36 -0600
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by tiger.med-info.com (8.12.8/8.12.8/Debian-1) id h3BA5adv027030;
Fri, 11 Apr 2003 04:05:36 -0600
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Kevin M. Rosenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ITP: common-lisp-devel -- Metapackage for Common Lisp development
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 04:05:36 -0600
X-Debbugs-CC: [email protected]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.3 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,MSG_ID_ADDED_BY_MTA_3,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,
X_DEBBUGS_CC
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2003-04-11
Severity: wishlist
* Package name : common-lisp-devel
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Kevin Rosenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : [ No yet written ]
* License : BSD
Description : Metapackage for Common Lisp development
I received an e-mail from a Debian user who (correctly) states that
Debian is the premier platform for Common Lisp development. He
requested a metapackage such as common-lisp-devel which will depend on
-- at least CL implementation and suggest others
-- all CL source packages
-- all CL tools and documentation
That's about 90 binary packages. Before working on such a package, I'd
like to solicit feedback from others if they thinks this is a good
idea.
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux tiger 2.4.20 #3 SMP Sat Mar 22 13:03:46 MST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 188569-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Apr 2004 01:30:15 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 10 18:30:15 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 216.184.11.30.unused.swcp.com (boa.b9.com) [216.184.11.30]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BCTna-0002s2-00; Sat, 10 Apr 2004 18:30:15 -0700
Received: from tiger.med-info.com (tiger.med-info.com [216.184.11.129])
by boa.b9.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Debian-3) with ESMTP id i3B1UDj9018009
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 10 Apr 2004 19:30:13 -0600
Received: from tiger.med-info.com ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1])
by tiger.med-info.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Debian-4) with ESMTP id
i3B1UDe7007348
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 10 Apr 2004 19:30:13 -0600
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by tiger.med-info.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Debian-4) id i3B1UD4N007345
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 10 Apr 2004 19:30:13 -0600
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 19:30:13 -0600
From: "Kevin M. Rosenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.40
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1
I decided this was a bad idea.
