Hi, On Tuesday 14 December 2004 23:35, Josselin Mouette wrote: > First, please don't send mails to the BTS with a local address. > > Le mardi 14 décembre 2004 à 20:06 +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a
Yes, how I cursed that one, once I realised it had got out. I sent three ITPs, and one made it out wrong. I knew some one would spot it, nonetheless ;) <snip> > > * Package name : libxbox-dev > > Version : 0.1.0 > > Upstream Author : David Pye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * URL : http://www.xbox-linux.org > > * License : GPL > > Description : Libxbox-dev provides the headers for libxbox0 and the > > libxbox.so symlink <snip again> > Why do you need to make it a separate source package? Ah. So that's what I did wrong, maybe. The two packages build from the same source. Does that mean a single ITP is necessary? I have not raised ITPs before, so was not sure exactly. One question this raises in my mind: suppose I have a single source tar.gz, that I want to build into four debian binary packages, with different names (obviously). If this should require only one ITP, which package name should the ITP be made for? David -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GCS d- s-: a-- C++ UL++++ P L+++ E--- W++ N+ o+ K- w--- O M V- PS+ PE+ Y+ PGP t 5- X+ R- tv+ b+ DI++ D+ G+ e++ h--- r++ y++ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------