Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:14 -0500 (CDT)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jun 2003 09:47:39 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jun 14 04:47:38 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail010.syd.optusnet.com.au [210.49.20.138] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 19R7dJ-0003RU-00; Sat, 14 Jun 2003 04:47:37 -0500
Received: from localhost (c16519.mirnd1.nsw.optusnet.com.au [210.49.110.138])
        by mail010.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.11.6p2/8.11.6) with ESMTP id 
h5E9lZ522230
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 14 Jun 2003 19:47:35 +1000
Received: from netsnipe by localhost with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
        id 19R7dG-0006RG-00
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 14 Jun 2003 19:47:34 +1000
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 19:47:34 +1000
From: Andrew Lau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ITP: sussen -- A GNOME 2 client for the Nessus security scanner
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.10.1
X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected]
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Sender: Andrew Lau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-21.6 required=4.0
        tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE,PGP_SIGNATURE_2,USER_AGENT_MUTT,
              X_DEBBUGS_CC
        autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_10
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_10 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)


--+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-06-14
Severity: wishlist

* Package name    : sussen
  Version         : 0.2
  Upstream Author : Loren Bandiera <sussen(+)starchamber.ca>
* URL             : http://sussen.sourceforge.net/
* License         : GPL
  Description     : A GNOME 2 client for the Nessus security scanner

 << Note: This is not the final description. >>=20

 Sussen is a client for the Nessus Security Scanner for the GNOME
 desktop.  Sussen is easy to use, allowing one to perform a
 vulnerabiltiy assessment with just a few mouse clicks.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux espresso 2.4.21-rc7 #1 Sun Jun 8 02:25:16 EST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=3DC, LC_CTYPE=3DC


--=20
----------------------------------------------------------------------
* Andrew "Netsnipe" Lau         Computer Science & Student Rep, UNSW *
*   # apt-get into it            Debian GNU/Linux Package Maintainer *
*    <netsnipe(+)debianplanet.org\0>   <alau(+)cse.unsw.edu.au\0>    *
* 1024D/2E8B68BD: 0B77 73D0 4F3B F286 63F1  9F4A 9B24 C07D 2E8B 68BD *
----------------------------------------------------------------------

--+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+6u82myTAfS6LaL0RAn5PAJ9LtrqQNa+BFrnE21/nU7KZatL+wgCbBp63
AUEli6/ii2yPnGShOHCuIuA=
=y5QJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI--

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 197365-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Sep 2005 02:55:52 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 14 19:55:52 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl-201-129-37-187.prod-infinitum.com.mx (cerdita.damog.net) 
[201.129.37.187] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EFjuh-0001Ku-00; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 19:55:52 -0700
Received: by cerdita.damog.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id B9E1F107B7D; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:14 -0500 (CDT)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: WNPP bug closed
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:14 -0500 (CDT)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Moreno Garza)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,VALID_BTS_CONTROL 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 390

Hello,

This is an automatic mail sent to close the RFP you have reported or 
are involved with.

Your RFP wnpp bug is being closed because of the following reasons:
- It is, as of today, older than 600 days.
- It haven't had any activity recently.
- The amount of ITPs on the Debian BTS is huge and we need to
  clean up a bit the place.

As this an automatic procedure, it could of course have something
wrong and probably it would be closing some bugs that are not 
intended by owners and submitters (like you) to be closed, for
example if the RFP is still of your interest, or there has been 
some kind of activity around it. In that case, please reopen the
bug, do it, DO IT NOW! (I don't want to be blamed because of
mass closing and not let people know that they can easily reopen
their bugs ;-).

To re-open it, you simply have to mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a body text like this:

reopen 123456
thanks bts

Replacing '123456' for the number of your RFP bug. The subject of the
mail is ignored. Or if you have any kind of problems when dealing with
the BTS, feel free to contact me and I'd be more than happy to help
you on this: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.

This is the first mass wnpp closing that will be done. The next close
will be done on inactive RFPs older than 450 days and finally, the
ones older than 365 days (an automatic script will close *inactive*
RFPs when they reach one year old).

A similar process is being applied to the ITP wnpp bugs in these
days.

Thanks for your cooperation,

 -- David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:54:42 -0500


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to