Your message dated Thu, 29 Sep 2005 07:32:03 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323679: fixed in xed 0.9.1-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Aug 2005 21:39:08 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 17 14:39:08 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 220pc220.sshunet.nl (mordor.wolffelaar.nl) [145.97.220.220]
(Debian-exim)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E5Vcq-000567-00; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 14:39:08 -0700
Received: from jeroen by mordor.wolffelaar.nl with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1E5Vcq-0000Q0-6M
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 23:39:08 +0200
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Debbugs-CC: David Z Maze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: O: xed -- The standard text editor, for X
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 23:39:08 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
The current maintainer of xed, David Z Maze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
has orphaned this package. If you want to be the new maintainer, please
take it -- see http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/index.html#howto-o for
detailed instructions how to adopt a package properly.
The maintainer writes:
| xed is something of a novelty package written in Tcl, and there are many
| other text editors that are actually useful. It hasn't got much support from
| its upstream recently. Although it should not be particulary hard to
| maintain, arguably there are better alternatives for it.
Some information about this package:
Package: xed
Binary: xed
Version: 0.9.1-4
Priority: extra
Section: editors
Maintainer: David Z Maze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Architecture: all
Standards-Version: 3.5.9.0
Format: 1.0
Directory: pool/main/x/xed
Files: 645ffb8bb9e74f25ebf6c71433fe88e6 508 xed_0.9.1-4.dsc
61137b0beba3ad06840f2f4b49118457 40951 xed_0.9.1.orig.tar.gz
4210d5a75a4def91d93276c986a1a1ca 2333 xed_0.9.1-4.diff.gz
Package: xed
Priority: extra
Section: editors
Installed-Size: 94
Maintainer: David Z Maze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Architecture: all
Version: 0.9.1-4
Depends: tcl8.4 | tcl8.3
Suggests: tk8.4 | tk8.3
Filename: pool/main/x/xed/xed_0.9.1-4_all.deb
Size: 23722
MD5sum: bbd20c191bb54d090668661b6bd4531e
Description: The standard text editor, for X
xed is a Tcl/Tk reimplementation of the standard text editor,
ed. It includes a window showing the file you're editing,
but also has the classic efficient text-based interface
Unix users have loved for years.
Tag: works-with::plaintext, use::editing
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 323679-close) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Sep 2005 14:38:11 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 29 07:38:11 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EKzS7-0000Cm-00; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 07:32:03 -0700
From: Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#323679: fixed in xed 0.9.1-6
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 07:32:03 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Source: xed
Source-Version: 0.9.1-6
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xed, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
xed_0.9.1-6.diff.gz
to pool/main/x/xed/xed_0.9.1-6.diff.gz
xed_0.9.1-6.dsc
to pool/main/x/xed/xed_0.9.1-6.dsc
xed_0.9.1-6_all.deb
to pool/main/x/xed/xed_0.9.1-6_all.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated xed package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 13:50:00 +0200
Source: xed
Binary: xed
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.9.1-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
xed - The standard text editor, for X
Closes: 323679
Changes:
xed (0.9.1-6) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New maintainer (Closes: #323679).
* Moved to optional.
* Repackaged using newer debhelper templates.
* Removed maintainer-scripts, obsolete with use of debhelper.
* Bumped policy version.
Files:
31556e9c30e3f674b499905fcaf646db 563 editors optional xed_0.9.1-6.dsc
e1c8ea23ac71778e8eac994ab0c873da 2440 editors optional xed_0.9.1-6.diff.gz
e6f3c4e7dad6fbb56e3bdbf9db798f35 23516 editors optional xed_0.9.1-6_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDO/nqxa93SlhRC1oRAmlxAJ0Wit5QbLrBsNeZJcxcw9XJE0pg0gCg34gR
XeLmVWErsBUVjnjZjnGtLxU=
=g4/R
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
