[ The subject should have read "ITA", not "ITO". ] Duncan Findlay wrote: > Whoops, looks like I missed that dependency on re2c >= 0.10.0 for > spamassassin, but I think it's working fine with 0.9.x. (At least, I > haven't found a problem with it.)
That's fortunate; I guess spamassassin upstream developed their support against re2c 0.10, which I believe was the previous stable release before 0.12. According to the upstream re2c changelog, there's been a lot of activity since 0.9.12. > I'd be happy to co-maintain the package if you would like a > co-maintainer. (Though I'm not going to have much time for Debian in > the next couple of weeks.) Thanks, but I think I can handle a single binary package like re2c just fine. As a devoted spamassassin user, spamassassin compatibility is my top priority for re2c. BTW, are you planning to fix the sa-update cron spam issue (#425962) soon? :) -- Robert Edmonds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
