Andreas Henriksson wrote: > Please note that the source tarball is tainted by both CVS directories > and binaries, and thus likely needs to be repackaged for > DFSG-cleanliness.
while i agree that having cvs meta data in a tarball is ugly and should be avoided when doing the checkout to produce the tarball oneself, it's not necessary in order to meet DFSG. same with the binaries. if all binaries which end up in the .deb are rebuild during te build process of the package, *and* all sources for those binaries are included, they don't need to be removed in order to meet DFSG. -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
