On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Trent W. Buck <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 08:22:51AM -0800, Daniel Moerner wrote: >> I am willing to adopt scheme48. I currently maintain ypsilon, an >> R6RS Scheme interpreter that is waiting in NEW. Ypsilon only >> supports amd64 and x86; I still use scheme48 on my powerpc and armel >> machines. > > Cool, let me know what you need from me to action that.
Nothing at all beyond the original ITP, I just need to make an upload when I'm ready. I just wanted to give you some background. >> Fourth, I presume that pkg-scheme48 is a dead group? > > I certainly have no involvement with it. I think it was set up when > Jorgen was co-maintaining scheme48 with another DD (Emilio?). > >> I would have no issue with starting a pkg-scheme group, or at least >> a way to coordinate scsh with scheme48. > > scsh is also orphaned, because even back when I was using s48 I was > trying to drop my scsh dependencies. You may wish to adopt scsh as > well :-) That's something to consider, although I think I will take my time on moving forward with that. >> Thanks for orphaning a package that is not a mess. > > You're welcome, although probably if I were you the first thing I'd do > is move it to dh(1) ;-) It was the first thing I did :) Regards, Daniel -- Daniel Moerner <[email protected]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
