On Wednesday 03 August 2005 18:54, Andrew Suffield wrote: > It's easy and effective, when you do it right. A group is defined by > the property you're talking about, and the world is divided into > 'things with this property' and 'things without this property'. A > classification of 'male or female' is invalid; it should have been > 'male or not male' and 'female or not female', as two groups.
That's true of predicate calculus categories, but people categorize very differently, at least according to Lakoff. -k -- How many Unix hacks does it take to change a light bulb? Let's see, can you use a shell script for that or does it need a C program? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
