On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 08:16:14AM +0200, annabelle tully wrote: > I'm not against Debian Women at all. I am against the image it can > give. The basic points of Debian Women you wrote are great, but I fear > DW might not reflect those points enough.
Did you actually read my email? Especially: > >But more importantly, it's an impression that's *false*. Many of the > >participants in d-w are active in technical aspects of the project. > >Several are in the new maintainer queue. We have more women involved in > >Debian than we've ever had before. So it's a problem if d-w gives the > >impression of being a bunch of people uninterested in doing anything > >technical. Certainly, getting rid of the project would be one way of > >solving that. Alternatively, we could fix the impression that people get > >in order to ensure that it reflects reality. > > > >So, as someone who's observed this impression, it would be really > >helpful if you could tell us what gave you that impression and what > >could be done to rectify it. Lists of maintained packages? Interviews? > >Daily emails with bugs closed by women? Seriously, communicating the > >goals of d-w with the rest of the project is important and I'm sure that > >nobody is happy with people getting the wrong idea. ? -- Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
