Your message dated Tue, 18 Jan 2005 17:34:25 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#289410: Processed: Bug #289410: www.debian.org: not a typo
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Jan 2005 23:34:33 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 08 15:34:33 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gondolin.schmehl.info [83.243.42.75]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CnQ6L-0008GU-00; Sat, 08 Jan 2005 15:34:33 -0800
Received: from pd9ea4bc2.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([217.234.75.194]
helo=annuminas.schmehl.info)
by gondolin.schmehl.info with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1CnQ6J-0007Bw-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 09 Jan 2005 00:34:31 +0100
Received: from alex by annuminas.schmehl.info with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1CnQ5n-0001Aw-00; Sun, 09 Jan 2005 00:33:59 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15"
From: Alexander Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: www.debian.org: Typo in german translation of consiturion
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2
Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2005 00:33:59 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: minor
Hi!
In second item of the numbered list of section 6.1 of the german
consitution (http://www.debian.org/devel/constitution.de.html) you can
read:
"In Fällen, bei denen Entwickler miteinander vereinbare technische
Richtlinien oder Standpunkte erfüllen müssen"
That should be "vereinbarte" (missing "t").
Yours sincerely,
Alexander
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-k7
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 289410-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Jan 2005 16:34:52 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 18 08:34:52 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CqwJf-0005aP-00; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 08:34:51 -0800
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 18 Jan 2005 16:34:19 -0000
Received: from c198073.adsl.hansenet.de (EHLO homer) (213.39.198.73)
by mail.gmx.net (mp014) with SMTP; 18 Jan 2005 17:34:19 +0100
X-Authenticated: #7842102
From: Tobias Toedter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Matthias Lutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#289410: Processed: Bug #289410: www.debian.org: not a typo
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 17:34:25 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
boundary="nextPart1237421.tJhz7rs8UN";
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--nextPart1237421.tJhz7rs8UN
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
On Monday 17 January 2005 21:01, Matthias Lutz wrote:
> * Tobias Toedter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Monday 2005-01-17 17:55):
> > Hi Matthias,
> >
> > I guess you're right. How about rewording the sentence a little bit, to
> > make the meaning clearer?
> >
> > "In F=E4llen, bei denen Entwickler miteinander kompatible technische
> > Richtlinien oder Standpunkte erf=FCllen m=FCssen ..."
> >
> > or maybe
> >
> > "In F=E4llen, bei denen Entwickler technische Richtlinien oder
> > Standpunkte erf=FCllen m=FCssen, die miteinander vereinbar sind ..."
>
> That should solve the problem. Both versions are OK; the second one
> seems to be even more comprehensible, so my vote goes to that one.
Hi,
I've fixed that, using the second version. Thanks for reopening the bug.
Cheers,
=2D-=20
Tobias
Early to bed and early to rise and you'll
be groggy when everyone else is wide awake.
--nextPart1237421.tJhz7rs8UN
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBB7TqVCqqEJ0Fs8twRAjPSAJ4mSQSFBsQQHpx+Fm9qEWaSygC7UACeJcBe
I837hgDBlzFCWPdDoDipInQ=
=b+1B
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nextPart1237421.tJhz7rs8UN--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
