Your message dated Wed, 19 Jan 2005 21:23:57 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#291188: www.debian.org: ports/amd64/ mentions to be most
complete after i386
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Jan 2005 10:22:26 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 19 02:22:26 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from chemo14.sci.kun.nl [131.174.179.49]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CrCyo-0000wn-00; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 02:22:26 -0800
Received: from egonw by chemo14.sci.kun.nl with local (Exim 4.43)
id 1CrCy6-00065F-HN; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 11:21:42 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Egon Willighagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: www.debian.org: ports/amd64/ mentions to be most complete after i386
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.5
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 11:21:42 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
The webpage http://www.debian.org/ports/amd64/ mentions in paragraph three
"Taking the ported source packages count, debian-amd64 is the most complete
port after i386, see the Buildd stats."
But looking at the picture linked, powerpc is more complete too, at least
most of the time in the graph.
Egon
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-9-amd64-k8-smp
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 291188-done) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Jan 2005 05:25:02 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 19 21:25:02 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from zoot.lafn.org [206.117.18.6]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CrUoY-0003sz-00; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 21:25:02 -0800
Received: from localhost.localdomain
(wbar6-lax1-4-10-203-108.lax1.dsl-verizon.net [4.10.203.108])
(authenticated bits=0)
by zoot.lafn.org (8.12.3p3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id j0K5Ot8q046710
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);
Wed, 19 Jan 2005 21:25:01 -0800 (PST)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: from kraai by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1CrUnW-0000hb-2W; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 21:23:59 -0800
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 21:23:57 -0800
From: Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Egon Willighagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#291188: www.debian.org: ports/amd64/ mentions to be most
complete after i386
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.1 (built Wed, 18 Aug 2004 01:12:09 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on localhost.localdomain)
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.80/629/Tue Dec 14 11:01:57 2004
clamav-milter version 0.80j
on zoot.lafn.org
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 11:21:42AM +0100, Egon Willighagen wrote:
> The webpage http://www.debian.org/ports/amd64/ mentions in paragraph three
> "Taking the ported source packages count, debian-amd64 is the most complete
> port after i386, see the Buildd stats."
>
> But looking at the picture linked, powerpc is more complete too, at least
> most of the time in the graph.
I've removed said claim.
--
Matt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
