Your message dated Tue, 22 Feb 2005 00:05:23 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#296198: debian.org: problem navigating software search
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Feb 2005 23:45:54 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 20 15:45:54 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gizmo11ps.bigpond.com [144.140.71.21]
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D30lu-0000aH-00; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 15:45:54 -0800
Received: (qmail 4463 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2005 23:45:21 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO psmam08.bigpond.com) (144.135.25.91)
by gizmo11ps.bigpond.com with SMTP; 20 Feb 2005 23:45:21 -0000
Received: from cpe-144-132-244-7.nsw.bigpond.net.au ([144.132.244.7]) by
psmam08.bigpond.com(MAM REL_3_4_2a 153/2032001) with SMTP id 2032001; Mon, 21
Feb 2005 09:45:21 +1000
Received: from davidc by localhost with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1D30lN-0002v3-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 10:45:21 +1100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: David Creelman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: debian.org: problem navigating software search
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 10:45:20 +1100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: David Creelman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
When searching for software in the packages page it is annoying to have
to move back up to the top of the page to get to the next page of
software.
Why not duplicate the back (<<) forward (>>) links on the page at the
bottom of the page? That way the user doesn't need to move back to the
top of the page to do 'next'.
Thanks
David
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-k7
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 296198-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Feb 2005 23:05:24 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 21 15:05:24 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from higgs.djpig.de [213.133.98.126]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D3McG-00072O-00; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 15:05:24 -0800
Received: from djpig by higgs.djpig.de with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1D3McF-0004St-6B
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 00:05:23 +0100
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 00:05:23 +0100
From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#296198: debian.org: problem navigating software search
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 10:45:20AM +1100, David Creelman wrote:
> When searching for software in the packages page it is annoying to have
> to move back up to the top of the page to get to the next page of
> software.
>
> Why not duplicate the back (<<) forward (>>) links on the page at the
> bottom of the page? That way the user doesn't need to move back to the
> top of the page to do 'next'.
Done.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
