Your message dated Sun, 17 Apr 2005 14:25:05 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#304992: www.debian.org: www.debian.org/News has same date 
(1 Jan 2005) for woody r4 and r5 point releases
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Apr 2005 02:16:44 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 16 19:16:44 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cpe-65-26-182-85.indy.res.rr.com (sisyphus.deadbeast.net) 
[65.26.182.85] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DMzL2-0001zI-00; Sat, 16 Apr 2005 19:16:44 -0700
Received: by sisyphus.deadbeast.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 10C5968C026; Sat, 16 Apr 2005 21:16:43 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: www.debian.org: www.debian.org/News has same date (1 Jan 2005) for 
woody r4
 and r5 point releases
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.9
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2005 21:16:42 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal

Something looks wrong here:

[01 Jan 2005] Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 updated (r5)
[18 Feb 2005] Debian project at several conferences and expos
[01 Jan 2005] Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 updated (r4)

According to my debian-announce folder[1], the r5 point release was done on
16 April 2005, not 1 January.

[1] Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
    http://lists.debian.org/debian-announce/debian-announce-2005/msg00001.html

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-powerpc-smp
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 304992-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Apr 2005 13:25:16 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 17 06:25:16 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DN9m0-0002EK-00; Sun, 17 Apr 2005 06:25:16 -0700
Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10)
        id 8678E64D42; Sun, 17 Apr 2005 13:25:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id DD5484EC71; Sun, 17 Apr 2005 14:25:05 +0100 (BST)
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2005 14:25:05 +0100
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#304992: www.debian.org: www.debian.org/News has same date (1 
Jan 2005) for woody r4 and r5 point releases
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

* Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-04-16 21:16]:
> Something looks wrong here:
> 
> [01 Jan 2005] Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 updated (r5)
> [18 Feb 2005] Debian project at several conferences and expos
> [01 Jan 2005] Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 updated (r4)
> 
> According to my debian-announce folder[1], the r5 point release was done on
> 16 April 2005, not 1 January.

Joey has fixed this already.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to