What exactly do you want me to say? This seems to be saying that there are no problems with isdnutils 3.0 (which is in both slink and potato). I don't see any point in reporting things that do work in Debian.
Jay Treacy On Thu, Apr 01, 1999 at 11:34:01AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > Paul Slootman wrote: > > On Wed 31 Mar 1999, Martin Schulze wrote: > > > > > > To the webmasters: > > > > > > Please document the following on the page covering problems that are > > > likely to occur when switching to Linux 2.2. > > > > > > The ISDN subsystem in Linux 2.2.x is the same as in 2.0.35 and thus > > > needs isdnutils 2.2. (Note: ISDN in Linux 2.0.36 needed isdnutils > > > 3.0). Thus when using Linux 2.2.x together with ISDN it's likely that > > > you need to replace your isdnutils package with an older one. > > > > NO! > > > > isdnutils 3.0 WILL work with older kernel ISDN versions! I have taken > > pains to ensure this! If you have encountered any problems with isdnutils > > 3.0 with 2.0.35 or 2.2.x, please take this up with me to work it out; with > > my tests there was no problem at all besides iprofd (which no one really > > uses AFAIK, and which can be worked around if necessary). > > Ah, that's even far better! Webmasters, please document this on the > web page. > > Regards, > > Joey > > -- > A mathematician is a machine for converting coffee into theorems. > > Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists. > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
