> Relative links on web pages are a very good thing. That slash would break > things if the spi pages are one day moved to not being at the top of thier > very own domain or if they're mirrored elsewhere. "index" would be much > more appropriate.
No, they wouldn't. Now the links are to "." or "..", when they in reality should be to the directory "./" and "../". I added the trailing slash. The problem with href="." is that it expands to (at least in my Netscape Navigator 4.6) to "http://www.spi-inc.org/.";, which Netscape thinks is *another* page than "http://www.spi-inc.org/"; that it is viewing. Links should *never* be made to "index.html" files, since that is *another* address than the directory itself, and confuse most search engines, leading to double entries. -- \\// Peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se/ When answering to mailing list or news posting, please do not Cc me personally. Thanks.
