Vincent Renardias said: > On Thu, 18 Nov 1999, Stephen Turner wrote: > > Also, elm should be added to the Debian Y2K page http://www.debian.org/y2k/ > > Webmaster: > > Versions up to and including 2.4pl25ME+59 are known to have y2k > problems. > >From elm's changelog, 7 y2k pbms have been fixed between 2.4pl25ME+48 and > 2.4pl25ME+66. > I have no info on the y2k status (compliant or not) of the current > release.
I have made the following changes to the Y2K pages: elm-me+ <=2.4pl25ME+52-1 BAD http://www.ozone.fmi.fi/KEH/elm-2.4ME+.README elm-me+ 2.4pl25ME+56-1 OK? http://www.ozone.fmi.fi/KEH/elm-2.4ME+.README - Craig -- Craig Small VK2XLZ, PGP: AD 8D D8 63 6E BF C3 C7 47 41 B1 A2 1F 46 EC 90 Eye-Net Consulting http://www.eye-net.com.au/ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIEEE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Debian developer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
