Your message dated Sat, 28 Oct 2000 14:31:52 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#72996: www.debian.org: Unsuccessful package keyword search 
yields all packages
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Oct 2000 15:16:30 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 02 10:16:30 2000
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from nosferatu.whoi.edu [::ffff:128.128.17.23] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 13g7KP-0000w2-00; Mon, 02 Oct 2000 10:16:29 -0500
Received: from mail.whoi.edu (dns0.whoi.edu [128.128.16.1])
        by nosferatu.whoi.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 323CE3C78
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon,  2 Oct 2000 11:16:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from llama.whoi.edu ([128.128.64.38]) by mail.whoi.edu
          (Netscape Messaging Server 3.6)  with ESMTP id AAA3BBC
          for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 11:16:17 -0400
Received: from kkrueger by llama.whoi.edu with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
        id 13g7KC-0000lZ-00; Mon, 02 Oct 2000 11:16:16 -0400
From: Karl A.Krueger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: www.debian.org: Unsuccessful package keyword search yields all packages
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.2.10
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 11:16:16 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: www.debian.org
Version: 20001002
Severity: normal

An unsuccessful keyword search at http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages
will sometimes yield a list of all the packages in Debian at the moment.
This appears to be because a keyword that never appears is ignored, and a
search for no keywords is interpreted as a search for anything.  This is
arguably not the Right Thing for an unsuccessful search to do.

For example: 

http://cgi.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=IPv6&searchon=all&version=stable&release=all

This will yield a list of 4402 packages, all reported as 100% perfect
matches.


-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.2
Kernel Version: Linux llama 2.2.17 #1 SMP Fri Aug 11 12:16:38 EDT 2000 i686 
unknown


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 72996-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Oct 2000 13:29:43 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 28 08:29:43 2000
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from web1.lanscape.net [::ffff:64.240.156.194] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 13pW3L-0001FZ-00; Sat, 28 Oct 2000 08:29:43 -0500
Received: from sumpf.cyrius.com (IDENT:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [64.240.156.194])
        by web1.lanscape.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA23821;
        Sat, 28 Oct 2000 08:29:41 -0500
Received: by sumpf.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id B5F77155B2; Sat, 28 Oct 2000 14:31:52 +0100 (BST)
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2000 14:31:52 +0100
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Karl A . Krueger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#72996: www.debian.org: Unsuccessful package keyword search 
yields all packages
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; from [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, Oct 02, 2000 
at 11:16:16AM -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Karl A . Krueger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20001002 11:16]:
> An unsuccessful keyword search at http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages
> will sometimes yield a list of all the packages in Debian at the moment.
> 
> For example:
> http://cgi.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=IPv6&searchon=all&version=stable&release=all

This has been fixed.  Thanks for the bug report.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to