On Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 07:28:18AM +0100, peter karlsson wrote: > > Read that first sentence of mine you quoted above. > > Yes? What's the problem with moving the <font> tag inside it?
Then all the other files get that font setting, which is not what we want. > > Yeah, everything is broken and it is absolutely necessary to pass all the > > HTML validity checks > > Yes, it has. All pages should be valid, otherwise we could just go home > and don't do web pages. I work for a company that developes a web > browser, and one of the biggest problem is that we constantly have to > make our software break the rules because of stupid webmasters that > can't code HTML correctly¹. Feel free to vent your frustration with those webmasters that do much worse hacks, not me! You'll have plenty of very nasty people to bitch at, I'm sure. > > in the world right this moment no matter how will it look in browsers > > that are actually used. > > If HTML is used correctly, it will look as intended in all browsers. You don't get my point, which I've explained already... forget about it. > > > do you use a syntax-forgiving C compiler as well? > > Don't mix apples and oranges. > > Okay; do you you use a syntax-forgiving LaTeX version? (Mine isn't) I don't use TeX :> -- Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification
