Hello, I agree with Marcin, this patch should be applied, and maybe the pointed page updated. It is named "unstable.html", and speaks about woody.
ie, an english speaker should make a release/sid.wml file so that it could be used where we need it. After that, releases/index.wml could be also updated to point to the unstable page. Sorry, I'm so unsure of my english that I can't even try to do that... Bye, Mt. On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 09:50:58PM +0100, Marcin Owsiany wrote: > Hi! > > Shouldn't this patch be applied to packages.wml, so that it has > a consistent view? Or was that left out on purpose? > > regards > > Marcin > -- > Marcin Owsiany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > http://student.uci.agh.edu.pl/~porridge/ > GnuPG: 1024D/60F41216 FE67 DA2D 0ACA FC5E 3F75 D6F6 3A0D 8AA0 60F4 1216 > --- packages.wml~ Mon Jan 8 22:35:44 2001 > +++ packages.wml Tue Jan 9 21:46:46 2001 > @@ -67,6 +67,9 @@ > <DD>This area contains packages that haven't had sufficient testing or > have severe bugs (some that might even cause damage to your system).</DD> > > + <P>See the <a href="$(HOME)/releases/unstable/">unstable release pages</A> > + for more information. > + > </DL> > > <P>Note that same packages might appear in several distributions, but with
