On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 04:09:53PM -0500, David Starner wrote: > > Personally, I don't see a problem. I believe that by posting a message > > to a mailing list that is publically archived you implicitely indicated > > your consent with also publically archiving the message you posted, > > because we have been archiving messages since the very beginning of the > > lists (not all of those archives have survived till today, > > unfortunately). > > We might want to put a note on lists.debian.org, pointing out that > Debian reserves the right to archive any mail that comes into Debian.
You're right, I'll put it on the TODO. > Frankly, copyright-wise, we may be forced to remove something from the > archives if someone mailed something to list without permission of the > copyright owner. Yes, that's right, but these posts were made intentionally (unless someone tricked Sergio to post, or something). > Should we honor X-No-Archive? That's a fairly standard header with > this intent. I don't know, maybe, but unless it's already implemented, don't count on me doing it... :) > Also, I've looked up the history of the purity data in Debian before, in > archives that were maybe two years old at the time. That was in no FAQ. > There's a lot more than just technical content in the email. The purity data? -- Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification
