Anthony Fok: > Netscape 4.x is buggy and will have problem when a nested table doesn't > have all the closing </TD> </TR> tags, so yes, adding them is > definitely better. :-)
Well, if you use nested tables, then you're on really thin ice, that's something that's extremly seldom necessary. I remember doing nested tables once, but I can't remember having problems with having to write </TD> or </TR> even then. > Also, it _might_ save some the browser some time from parsing and > guessing where the closing </TD> </TR> should be. Well, according to the spec, <TD> end if the parser finds a <TR> or another <TD> or <TH>, and a <TR> ends at the next <TR> (both end at the end of <TABLE> of course), so that shouldn't be a problem. Actually, you might save time parsing by not having to parse redundant tags. > Also, it seems that everyone is heading towards XHTML and/or XML > eventually, so it is probably a good time to start changing our habits > now. :-) So, that means that we are also going to close all paragraphs, remove invalid use of <br><br>, and so on? -- \\// peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se/ Statement concerning unsolicited e-mail according to Swedish law: http://www.softwolves.pp.se/peter/reklampost.html
