Debian WWW CVS: > Log message: > we cannot assume old revision is 1.1 if it is not defined (i.e. not > found in the headers), because that's a valid current revision of an > English document; 1.0 should work OTOH
Yes? And if there is no translation-check, why shouldn't we be able to assume that it is at least a translation of the first ever English version (i.e 1.1)? -- \\// peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se/ Statement concerning unsolicited e-mail according to Swedish law: http://www.softwolves.pp.se/peter/reklampost.html
