"James A. Treacy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, Feb 09, 2002 at 09:43:19PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 09, 2002 at 03:10:37PM -0500, James A. Treacy wrote: > > > > > > Isn't lack of transparency support for png one of the reasons we put the > > > switch off? > > > > No, it was the lack of support for PNG's transparency in Netscape 4. > > Hmm. Isn't that what I just said?
It initially read to me like you were suggesting PNG itself lacked transparency support; perhaps Josip read it the same way. -- James
