Your message dated Fri, 30 Aug 2002 13:30:47 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#158787: www.debian.org: /releases/stable/errata has wrong
deb line
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Aug 2002 20:40:24 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 29 15:40:24 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from p508ea5b5.dip.t-dialin.net (controller.domain.lan)
[80.142.165.181]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17kW5Y-0001G6-00; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 15:40:24 -0500
Received: from neo.domain.lan (neo.domain.lan [192.168.74.10])
by controller.domain.lan (Postfix) with ESMTP
id B5AC81F06; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 22:27:30 +0200 (CEST)
From: Noel Koethe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: www.debian.org: /releases/stable/errata has wrong deb line
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 22:31:39 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-29
Severity: normal
Hello,
the deb lines at "Point releases"
# proposed additions for a 3.0 point release
deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian dists/proposed-updates/
deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US dists/proposed-updates/
doesn't work. apt return a 404.
neuro told me on IRC that the URLs are outdated but I have
no idea whats the correct lines.:(
thx.
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux neo 2.4.18-k7 #1 Sun Apr 14 13:19:11 EST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 158787-done) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Aug 2002 11:27:01 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 30 06:27:00 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cibalia.gkvk.hr [161.53.211.3]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17kjvY-0004LG-00; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 06:27:00 -0500
Received: from joy by cibalia.gkvk.hr with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 17kjzD-0000UI-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 13:30:47 +0200
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 13:30:47 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#158787: www.debian.org: /releases/stable/errata has wrong deb
line
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
From: Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 09:33:24AM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> > the deb lines at "Point releases"
> >
> > # proposed additions for a 3.0 point release
> > deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian dists/proposed-updates/
> > deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US dists/proposed-updates/
> >
> > doesn't work. apt return a 404.
> >
> > neuro told me on IRC that the URLs are outdated but I have
> > no idea whats the correct lines.:(
>
> I am using the following:
>
> deb http://ftp.at.debian.org/debian/ woody-proposed-updates main contrib
> non-free
> deb http://ftp.at.debian.org/debian-non-US/ woody-proposed-updates/non-US
> main contrib non-free
>
> I am not sure if the work similar with http.us.d.o and non-us.d.o (but
> should) and if we usually add contrib and non-free to the sugguestions,
> too.
Based on this, the layout of the directories, and the README file in the
first mentioned location, I've updated the page.
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
