Your message dated Sun, 27 Oct 2002 16:12:48 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jun 2002 05:48:10 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 13 00:48:10 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from fep02-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com [66.185.86.72]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17INSs-0001SK-00; Thu, 13 Jun 2002 00:48:10 -0500
Received: from green.daf.2y.net ([24.102.84.29])
by fep02-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com
(InterMail vM.5.01.04.13 201-253-122-122-113-20020313) with ESMTP
id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 13 Jun 2002 01:47:39 -0400
Received: from daf by green.daf.2y.net with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 17INSN-0002SK-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 13 Jun 2002 01:47:39 -0400
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 01:47:39 -0400
From: Duncan Findlay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: lists search broken?
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH PLAIN at
fep02-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com from [24.102.84.29] using ID <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> at Thu, 13 Jun 2002 01:47:39 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: listarchives
Severity: normal
The lists search seems to be somewhat broken.
Search for "procmail" on d-devel for Apr to Jun 2002 at
http://lists.debian.org/search.html.
I get "No matches."
But that is incorrect:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] pwd
/org/lists.debian.org/lists/debian-devel/2002
[EMAIL PROTECTED] grep procmail debian-devel-200205 | wc -l
21
Thanks,
--
Duncan Findlay
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 149845-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Oct 2002 15:12:55 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 27 09:12:54 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pork.gkvk.hr [161.53.211.6] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 185p5x-0005Rb-00; Sun, 27 Oct 2002 09:12:54 -0600
Received: from joy by pork.gkvk.hr with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 185p5s-0002Aq-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 27 Oct 2002 16:12:48 +0100
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 16:12:48 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fixed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
From: Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.2 required=5.0
tests=SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,
USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Hey,
It appears that this bug is fixed. I don't know how, but glimpse decided to
actually -- <gasp> -- work :)
--
Joy
